Provincial Lag in the protection from indirect discrimination pair of disabled people

Posting in Forum of BICEPS-INFO to the article:
Salzburg is a brand-new ECJ-judgments, the first ... Forum post (14.08.08)

http://www.bizeps.or.at/news.php?nr=9048#fid8518 14. August 2008, 12:46 PM
That protection from Discrimination applies not only to the victims, but also on people who are disadvantaged, BECAUSE they are Affected in the relationship (such as relatives and Close associates), is not a new legal opinion, but was provided by means of figurative ECJ case law, the only clear (sh. Judgments in the matter Coleman, Case C-303/06and Feryn Case C-54/07). For this reason, I am with the Positive formulation in the above Article (“Chance”) are not happy. I agree with Klaudia Karoliny: “Such statements are not ALLOWED to give it to ...“.
It is an indictment of our alleged rule of law, when public Law bodies, such as the countries (against better knowledge) in your country are allowed to ignore human laws and regulations, international laws, agreements, and equal treatment and freedom of rights of the Federal Constitution so long “” and in the administrative practice of the applicable law to bow, until they are summoned by international courts and procedure. Undeterred and shameless, the forces will be benefited from this imbalance that the legal process is to be managed by all the national authorities of the Affected. Blatant injustice is that even our highest courts have taken the prohibitions of Discrimination in the BV-G article 7, nor to the knowledge, but decisions about refuse or just such a unique national and international regulations ignore.

Translated by Yandex.Translate and Global Translator