When is redeveloped, the “eternal building site” in General?
Posting in Forum of BICEPS-INFO to the article:
Bartenstein: “care and social assistance lead out” ... Forum post (17.07.08)
http://www.bizeps.or.at/news.php?nr=9000#fid8327 17. July 2008 At 09:23
Yes, this is most overdue: “maintenance of the social help to lead out”! Social assistance does not have the potency to support people on a permanent basis. It is only designed to Bridge short-term crises. Even this failed social aid, as currently laid out, because subsequent re-run receivables for received supports, can never more from the existence of a crisis to recover. The recourse to social assistance, is one of Germany abolished. What a help that leads to life-long bondage?
Particularly fatal is the social assistance context in the case of the disabled, so if supports for long-term care needs, and assistance dependency on mechanisms of based on social assistance. On this “site” was laid with the care allowance act 15 years ago, although a good and solid Foundation, which carries on until today, a load-bearing function.
Unfortunately, the plans of the original architects and Visionaries has not been made. The Plan was rejected, it was not built solid. The builders, contrary to own promiseson this Base is not built, but the project will go. Further Stages were not taken in the attack.
Not only that, for reasons of prestige, year to year, materials delivered are redirected to other large construction sites and substandard building materials replaced. Again and again, even existing buildings have been torn down or dismantled. It has been built on this strong Foundation, just a holey hut, where the Wind whistles. The wrong builders were (and are?) never held accountable, as is often the case with Bauskandalen. (www.daheim-statt-heim.katja.at/hintergrund.php)
Translated by Yandex.Translate and Global Translator
- Related Posts (most related posts), value in brackets indicates the topic of:
- [D+263] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (1) [84.4%]
- [D+266] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (2) [84.4%]
- [D+270] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (3) [84.4%]
- [D+280] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (4) [84.4%]
- [D+281] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (5) [84.4%]
- [D+290] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (6) [84.4%]
- [D+293] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (7) [84.4%]
- [D+365] care law, state of emergency meets the legal care of a state of emergency (1) [84.4%]
- [D+1262] care in the Emergency [81.7%]
- [D+257] care: reorientation far failed! (Doctors week) [Random - 55.7%]
Leave a comment