We must not pretend to where he/she hears “hung”.
Posting in Forum of BICEPS-INFO to the article:
Ruppe: “It is worthy only Think that disabled people represent their concerns in their own” ... Forum post (02.09.08)
http://www.bizeps.or.at/news.php?nr=9096#fid8622 2. September 2008, 11:56 PM
Dear Mr. Mag. Ruppe,
I welcome your candidacy to no, and I wish you much success. Particularly Necessary, I think, that people participate in shaping the policy, have a look for the “total assistance needed”. I therefore welcome strongly that you want to cover ALL types of disability “” and the group would seek cross-sectoral cooperation for the achievement of disability policy objectives.
I stand fully to the principle of self-representation, but on the groups point out, the need for their own self-determination and Self-advocacy for a comprehensive assistance. For people with a learning disability, there are already developments for Self-advocacy (“People First” groups), other area is, however, regularly “through the grate”. The group of the severely disabled on several occasions, for example, need to awake comatose or brain-injured people or those with severe brain organic diseases, a mouthpiece, a “representation of self representation”, wherein some of the a – I opposition but not- (n).
A record of your Interviews, I would like to add a necessary addition. You say: “People with learning disabilities are also in the midst of society into small, well-supervised residential units. Since Sweden is a role model”. We must not pretend to be (also according to the UN disability Convention, art. 19) where he/she “belongs”. Of course, discrimination in the mainstream society. But whether in small self-managed managed outpatient, residential care groups or in the place of origin or family of Choice (also with a supply of financial and human support), or to life, depending on the possibility of assistance in your own home must be the freedom of choice granted. Also Sweden, a model is needed, even in people with the most severe cognitive support.
Addendum 2. September 2008 At 13:11
Mag. Sebastian Ruppe joins the note to supported “self-representation” severely multi-handicapped people, and the constructive criticism of the formulation for the “accommodation” for people with learning disabilities.
To Answer: http://www.bizeps.or.at/news.php?nr=9096#fid8624
Dear Mr Lichtenauer,
thank you for your encouraging, constructively critical post in which you give me important notes to Self-advocacy severe multiple disabled people and to me rightly to say that I have opened in my formulation of the “accommodation” for people with learning disabilities the idea of”space” rather closed instead.
This is exactly how I imagine the cooperation with “all of you out there”, because I'm not far from been an expert on All the/s and think I know everything, but, on the contrary, I can never stop learning and to expand my horizons in the field of disability.
People first and their Initiative at Home instead of home, which I appreciate very much! (for example, the design of the assistance benefit act) – would be for me a clear response and information partners in a possible. political work. And Sweden would be a first “education destination” from me!
With warm Regards from Graz
Sebastian Ruppe
Translated by Yandex.Translate and Global Translator
- Related Posts (most related posts), value in brackets indicates the topic of:
- Request to the NÖ Directive "Housing for mentally and multiple disabled people" (OPEN LETTER) [100%]
- Nursing care reform part 4: responsibility and justice truck [100%]
- Nursing care reform, part 1: 15 years care money a "success story"? [100%]
- [D+23] fundamental rights and freedoms recognised! [100%]
- [D+51] human rights - legal action is excluded [100%]
- [D+1500] the main barriers to Inclusion and participation, rights of disabled and needy people [100%]
- [D+263] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (1) [93.9%]
- [D+266] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (2) [93.9%]
- [D+270] care crisis 2.0 - the regulated Chaos (3) [93.9%]
- [D+100] denied responsibility [Random - 45.3%]
Leave a comment