- katja – at home instead of in the home - http://katja.at -

Feed-lethal Economy by Exit Option

Life-threatening conflicts of interest because of the burden due to the cost of care

Posting [1] as a response to the comment by user “The spring” in the BICEPS the Forum on the article by Mag. Marianne Karner: “Duration subject of Mortality”help” and no end in sight – The stone rolls. Euthanasia and the demise of the Human. [2]

The reference to may the judgment be nebulized economic interests were liable to recourse is subject to the offspring of tiger is quite entitled to. This effect, but I think it's small compared to unpronounceable attempt of those who were meant to be the elimination of the “members recourse,” never.

The much talked about “kin's recourse” (from offspring to parents in the so-called “homes”) is still or again in Styria, relevant (with regard to Carinthia, I don't know). And even then, the extent of the cost is staggered participation in the income (without having access to the assets) of the offspring in the social (I still am for the abolition).

More serious is, in many cases, however, the by home costs of continuous and often rapid deterioration of a possibly existing estate (e.g. savings, property) to prospective heirs. Because the subsidiary obligation to take the power of the patient to and from their own income AND assets, with or without members of recourse. This creates much more of a fatal pressure, both to heirs, as to the future testator.

There is also a pressure on the life attributed to long for their disabled children assistance, and dependent parents or Spouses of the patient. For this solidarity to meet the financial support needs for care is not being considered at all.

Similarly, at the assisted living home, there is a deductible and self-performance for outpatient care, supervision, or assistance for elderly or disabled members in all cases 80 to 100 percent of the costs. This is not taken into account even in the case of social neediness, the reasonableness of the burden even close.

In the case of a legalization of the sick killing on request, or even gemutmaßtem will or suicide-aid Considerations of self-defence or emergency assistance prior to the destruction of the economic existence were in the house.

Translated by Yandex.Translate and Global Translator

    Related Posts (most related posts), value in brackets indicates the topic of:
  1. Norway: Personal assistance without discrimination? [3] [42.2%]
  2. [D+241] lifestyle medicine needs to overcome repair medicine [4] [32.3%]